New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Beware of hidden fee hard-coded into z-nomp fork advertised by the devs #180
Comments
funny he called the commit "Added support for BTG" |
found also here in the node.js |
|
Also found in |
the code itself is wrong, it's not testing for this commit poolgold/z-nomp-bitcoin-gold@5e66e54 |
@pocesar It's telling that neither him nor anyone else has been active here since yesterdays clusterfuck of a launch. I'd expect all hands on deck on launch day and the following week. Not so with this project. Perhaps mission accomplished already? |
If this is really a Scam, then it is a double-pity. |
100 blocks if the confirmation time. All the pools are working like that.
**Edit (copy from post below):**
Guys, I need to finish this.
I want to apologies to all the people that have felt deceived.
I have been mining for a long time and have seen many tools taking such fees so I have taken this as generic. This is why I have decided to include a fee. My biggest mistake: I didn't edit the ReadMe and this is totally my fault. When I look from users’ perspective, I get their point that this looks like a scam. This was not my intent!
These are the action I will take:
**1. Return all the fees to the accounts they have been sent to**
**2. Continue to return all the future fees received on this account**
**3. I will not repeat this mistake ever again, I have taken the lesson**
I'm 23 but I have participated in many projects and I have always worked with integrity and for the good of my reputation. This situation has hurt it and my initial reaction was too defensive. I don't want to make excuses and I take full responsibility.
**In future, I will be consistent with my actions to prove myself as a honest man and developer and will provide all the help required to anyone!**
|
Interestingly a PR to remove this will not be merged (reference)
Aren't all merged changed and commits visible to everyone? |
@sammy007 was right all along. |
Redirected all resources away from BTG enough is enough. |
@StarbuckBG It's freaking unbelievable but totally telling that this has even to be explained: Samm007's proxy has the fee listed prominently in the readme. Your's is hidden. |
Not cool at all. If you got enough hashrate you can use my stratum with 2% devfee https://github.com/sammy007/zcash-proxy/releases. Unlocked versions (stratum and full stack pool) with source code access available for reasonable price. |
0 integrity.. sad.. |
@StarbuckBG 8K blocks premine is not enough? |
Your hidden fee is like a keylogger in open source software, no one actually read source of Linux kernel in a distributive including all the software. Did you inspect all deb-src yourself? People didn't expect this gem. Period. |
Invalid address transaction must go somewhere. If you like to use your address as default, in pool_configs/btg.json file simply add "invalidAddress":"your own fancy fallback address", https://github.com/poolgold/z-nomp-bitcoin-gold/blob/master/libs/paymentProcessor.js#L1403 |
I have no quarrels if you add fees into your example code, but the issue I find is with the lack of communication around it. It does appear that it was put in there without wanting people to find it (the check in comment didn't state 'adding fees' for example and no mention of it in the readme). Chances are if it wasn't for possibly 2 users it wouldn't have been found for some time. If you stated in the readme, or elsewhere in obvious documents that this has hard-coded fees included then I wouldn't have had an issue with it. Transparency of these things adds trust, explaining why gives an understanding on why there is a fee. The lack of transparency unfortunately removes that trust. And it leaves me personally questioning if I can truly trust BTG's intentions. |
I agree with you. I will add it the read me and will add comments around it so it easier to be found.
… On 13 Nov 2017, at 19:09, Bourne-ID ***@***.***> wrote:
I have no quarrels if you add fees into your example code, but the issue I find is with the lack of communication around it. It does appear that it was put in there without wanting people to find it (the check in comment didn't state 'adding fees' for example and no mention of it in the readme). Chances are if it wasn't for possibly 2 users it wouldn't have been found for some time.
If you stated in the readme, or elsewhere in obvious documents that this has hard-coded fees included then I wouldn't have had an issue with it. Transparency of these things adds trust, explaining why gives an understanding on why there is a fee. The lack of transparency unfortunately removes that trust. And it leaves me personally questioning if I can truly trust BTG's intentions.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrjrT8DmTTywF7Zapz3zfiUFJmhQb7Tks5s2HfNgaJpZM4Qbtma>.
|
@StarbuckBG
They have alternatives. Sammy implemented it for his proxy and I integrated BTG into MiningCore |
I have added this info the the ReadMe and also marked with comment where is the fee:
martin-key/node-stratum-pool@395aa29 <martin-key/node-stratum-pool@395aa29>
https://github.com/StarbuckBG/node-stratum-pool/commits/master <https://github.com/StarbuckBG/node-stratum-pool/commits/master>
… On 13 Nov 2017, at 19:09, Bourne-ID ***@***.***> wrote:
I have no quarrels if you add fees into your example code, but the issue I find is with the lack of communication around it. It does appear that it was put in there without wanting people to find it (the check in comment didn't state 'adding fees' for example and no mention of it in the readme). Chances are if it wasn't for possibly 2 users it wouldn't have been found for some time.
If you stated in the readme, or elsewhere in obvious documents that this has hard-coded fees included then I wouldn't have had an issue with it. Transparency of these things adds trust, explaining why gives an understanding on why there is a fee. The lack of transparency unfortunately removes that trust. And it leaves me personally questioning if I can truly trust BTG's intentions.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrjrT8DmTTywF7Zapz3zfiUFJmhQb7Tks5s2HfNgaJpZM4Qbtma>.
|
@StarbuckBG I asked for a stratum spec, idiot. Feel the difference. |
@sammy007 Hopeless. |
Btw there would be at least two working pools.. as I don't use this repo at all ;) |
I still can't understand why you are doing this when you got 8000 blocks of pre-mine? |
@sammy007 why you don't open your software that is containing fee? |
@StarbuckBG You get criticized because this issue is about your software. What the hell has Sammy's proxy to do with this? Stop attempting to deflect the blame. If you can't take the heat don't associate yourself with a shady project like this. Otherwise get used to the scrutiny resulting from the overall smell of this PoS. |
BTG team FORKed the client from Bitcoin Core. Nobody in Bitcoin is going to sue BTG for promoting scam. Look at how generous we are. :) |
@systemeintegratedsolutions You seem to have missed my point. |
There is no such thing as "inherent trust system" when forking. I am sure that there are at least 100 forks in GitHub containing malicious code. |
Yeah ok. That’s fair, but it still doesn’t excuse someone from just assuming that something is legit because it’s open source. This thread is getting tired though don’t you think? It’s a tired and dead horse 😝
From: TheComputerGenie [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 November 2017 3:38 PM
To: BTCGPU/BTCGPU <BTCGPU@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Dave Coates <dave@systeme.co.za>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [BTCGPU/BTCGPU] Beware of hidden fee hard-coded into z-nomp fork advertised by the devs (#180)
@systemeintegratedsolutions <https://github.com/systemeintegratedsolutions> You seem to have missed my point.
Every on of the modules used in the stratum and the portal are open-source as well. There is an inherent trust system upon which all of this functions. I am certain that the bgold "dev" didn't check the code for the imported modules any more than most folks that trusted him check to see if he added a self-serving fee to every block for the "work" of editing the header values; they trusted him as he trusted those before him.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)> , or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATG_Gkj0T1vsk2WY0Lf3efcqfec0rwS2ks5s3YxHgaJpZM4Qbtma> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ATG_GmfmZjDxITypmp-l1cIl8C_-HeHXks5s3YxHgaJpZM4Qbtma.gif>
|
Lmao. Now truth does not stand on your side so you want to quit the discussion. Okay, then please don't come back. :) I repeat, Bitcoin Gold is a scam and its team shall not be trusted. The developer has tried to steal users money twice since the launch date. |
@quadrigahacker BTG is a joke, and not a funny one, either. Just because I called you out when you said some dumb shit doesn't mean I like BTG. |
Sigh. No man. I’m saying this horse is dead. Let’s get off it and carry on with our lives.
From: quadrigahacker [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 November 2017 4:11 PM
To: BTCGPU/BTCGPU <BTCGPU@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Dave Coates <dave@systeme.co.za>; Mention <mention@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [BTCGPU/BTCGPU] Beware of hidden fee hard-coded into z-nomp fork advertised by the devs (#180)
Lmao. Now truth does not stand on your side so you want to quit the discussion. Okay, then please don't come back. :)
I repeat, Bitcoin Gold is a scam and its team shall not be trusted. The developer has tried to steal users money twice since the launch date.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)> , or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATG_GjP4SEvZonH86AerwQdzIh360p6Lks5s3ZQMgaJpZM4Qbtma> . <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ATG_GmW7eb469Y2ndapkbHXO2jO15NU9ks5s3ZQMgaJpZM4Qbtma.gif>
|
Guys, I need to finish this.
I want to apologies to all the people that have felt deceived.
I have been mining for a long time and have seen many tools taking such fees so I have taken this as generic. This is why I have decided to include a fee. My biggest mistake: I didn't edit the ReadMe and this is totally my fault. When I look from users’ perspective, I get their point that this looks like a scam. This was not my intent!
These are the action I will take:
** 1. Return all the fees to the accounts they have been sent to **
** 2. Continue to return all the future fees received on this account **
** 3. I will not repeat this mistake ever again, I have taken the lesson **
I'm 23 but I have participated in many projects and I have always worked with integrity and for the good of my reputation. This situation has hurt it and my initial reaction was too defensive. I don't want to make excuses and I take full responsibility.
** In future, I will be consistent with my actions to prove myself as a honest man and developer and will provide all the help required to anyone! **
… On 17 Nov 2017, at 16:17, OhGodAPet ***@***.***> wrote:
@quadrigahacker <https://github.com/quadrigahacker> BTG is a joke, and not a funny one, either. Just because I called you out when you said some dumb shit doesn't mean I like BTG.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrjrV-nS-aWzwrySvOouzGIgjDZkl1yks5s3ZV7gaJpZM4Qbtma>.
|
@StarbuckBG Thank you; I applaud the honesty. You can't change the past, but you admit you were wrong, and are trying to fix it, which is all anyone can ask. |
The transactions have already started. Please follow the account here - http://btgexp.com/address/GPY1LMyM8kaysLEB4a4nUCJ23Y6Wgd5zTC <http://btgexp.com/address/GPY1LMyM8kaysLEB4a4nUCJ23Y6Wgd5zTC>
… On 17 Nov 2017, at 18:25, OhGodAPet ***@***.***> wrote:
@StarbuckBG <https://github.com/starbuckbg> Thank you; I applaud the honesty. You can't change the past, but you admit you were wrong, and are trying to fix it, which is all anyone can ask.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#180 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADrjrUei1C3hez9hYqzd3HkgTJOpD1I2ks5s3bNjgaJpZM4Qbtma>.
|
@StarbuckBG In terms of this issue, you have now done what you needed to do. Well done. I think the biggest mistake that you have made is staying loyal to a team that appears to have abandoned you. You have taken all the heat, spending a considerable amount of time responding to issues. Jack Liao as the founder and figurehead should have been the one fronting, giving you the time and space to fulfil your role as one of the developers of this project. For the most part, the very few and lazy responses that I have seen from Jack has been tonally belligerent and bordering on unintelligible. From my perspective, he appears to be completely inept in terms leadership, and his ability to communicate in english. He appears to me to be an albertros around your neck (and indeed the neck of this project). This project is in desperate need of support from the open source developer community. There are some very smart people here that appear to have a range of skills needed to rescue this project and make it successful. Have no illusions, perception is reality, and the growing perception is that this project has no future. It may be worth considering thinking about ways you can encourage support from the open source community for this project. Possibly, one way to make this happen is to nucleate a new btcgpu movement - fork the fork with community support and with development proceeding with transparency and consensus. Relinquish control to the community and together, with you as the new figurehead/spokesperson, make btcgpu a competitive, truly trustless, decentralised, economically viable alternative cryptocurrency that miners can get excited about. You have a real opportunity to positively raise your profile and credibility by being the figurehead/spokesperson of a successful community driven project. |
@StarbuckBG 16 days ago someone asked you what changes you've made with z-nomp and mining clients, but you never answered the question straight away it was in thread. But easiest for you was to mute that person from the git.... #112 (comment) Not mentioning your other accounts such ZhiKosta and others on Slack multiple entities that you created to support your self writing comments to your self trough multiple accounts and promoting of gold pool, because all world hates you and everywhere are haters. Good psychiatric sessions can fix your bipolar and paranoid personality... You are just Quack Martin Kuvandzhiev, thief and now everyone on this planet know what you've done, too late for apologize, no jobs for you in USA you are on the black list = financial crimes - possible stealing of company money with malicious code. = Hands off. |
@S5h4D3S hey dude, go fuk yourself ok? Who the hell you think you are. If
you got scammed by anyone i am REALLY glad! Cos' you are prick asshole and
you deserve it.
…On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 1:08 PM, S5h4D3S ***@***.***> wrote:
@StarbuckBG <https://github.com/starbuckbg> 16 days ago someone asked you
what changes you've made with z-nomp and mining clients, but you never
answered the question straight away it was in thread. But easiest for you
was to mute that person from the git.... #112 (comment)
<#112 (comment)>
You are just Quack Martin Kuvandzhiev, thief and now everyone on this
planet know what have you done too late to apologize, no jobs for you in
USA you are on black list = financial crimes - possible stealing of company
money with malicious code. = Hands off.
Good luck...
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfnzlV2FlhCdKpZMp72qDPRcGytrG69Qks5s3rqRgaJpZM4Qbtma>
.
--
Greetings,
Zhivko Kostadinov
/*code smart...not hard.*/
|
@ZhiKosta I'm so glad that you joined the scam-y Bitcoin Gold and will soon lost all your money. :) |
@StarbuckBG, just look at how your other team members treat you. I think some of the anonymous account here might be Jack Liao who doesn't even dare to speak for you. I agree with @mjoh090 that you're truly under-served and should quit and create your own development team. |
If anyone's still in BTG you need to get out immediately because the scam continues. The official BTG website listed "My BTG wallet" as an approved wallet. Now it is known that this wallet is a scam and steals your Bitcoin. This is, what? The third time @StarbuckBG and Jack Liao try to steal your money, right? |
@quadrigahacker The loss of your BTG I imagine is very frustrating and disappointing for you. Have you tried speaking privately with @StarbuckBG about this issue? Maybe you can be compensated for your loss. Anyone that has lost money from pools or wallets endorsed by the BTCGPU team, before the red box 3rd-party disclaimer on the Bitcoingold.org website, I think is entitled to compensation. @quadrigahacker I suspect that you will find that it is as frustrating for Martin as it is for you that you have lost money. This is possibly a soluble issue. Go talk to him respectfully, and let us know the outcome. |
I think this guy is not here for the money. He gets paid to shit on the BTG
idea. Someone out there benefits from him shitting the coin. It's clear
from so long. He changes the truth, he reflects it in a way that always
make BTG the bad side.
I know personally that all the people lost with the unfortunate incident at
the beginning are being helped albeit slowly. This guy is not here for
compensation, he gets it by harming the name and the idea.
…On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:00 AM, mjoh090 ***@***.***> wrote:
@quadrigahacker <https://github.com/quadrigahacker> how much did you
lose? Have you tried speaking privately with @StarbuckBG
<https://github.com/starbuckbg> about this issue? Maybe you can be
compensated for your loss. Anyone that has lost money from pools or wallets
endorsed by the BTCGPU, before the red-box 3rd party disclaimer on the
Bitcoingold.org website, I think is entitled to compensation.
@quadrigahacker <https://github.com/quadrigahacker> I suspect that you
will find that it is as frustrating for Martin as it is for you that you
have lost money. This is possibly a soluble issue. Go talk to him
respectfully, and and let us know the outcome.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfnzlZ-pT7qJmq8pKpFXLLDUMGgP6zSxks5s3327gaJpZM4Qbtma>
.
--
Greetings,
Zhivko Kostadinov
/*code smart...not hard.*/
|
@ZhiKosta Yes, it is my understanding too that people who have lost money are being compensated. |
Not once he said anything for loosing money. Since the start he's bitching
and crying how bad this crypto is and found 10 different things to change
and reflect back so they look bad for BTG.
You are right about the compensation, but what i was telling is, i am
certain he haven't lost anything. He's being paid to be douche.
…On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:34 AM, mjoh090 ***@***.***> wrote:
@ZhiKosta <https://github.com/zhikosta> yes, it is my understanding too
that people who have lost money are are being compensated.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AfnzlUF7mXQnAVyVigesT91rbgo9GbDpks5s34W_gaJpZM4Qbtma>
.
--
Greetings,
Zhivko Kostadinov
/*code smart...not hard.*/
|
Lol who said I lost any money? I've never touched Bitcoin Gold from the beginning because from the first day I heard of BTG, I know it's a scam. Someone on Reddit did, however. And there're a lot of them. @StarbuckBG and Jack Liao is going to jail. I'm only here for some fun seeing how criminals like @StarbuckBG can lose all their reputations and money just by their wrong actions themselves. You really think me ditching here helped in any way of the BTG price going down? No, I don't think so. Not a lot of people would read Github comments. It's all just BTG team's own silly action. They've started to shot themselves in the foot from the beginning. Also, just curious, what's the "unfortunate incident in the beginning"? Are there any more scam-y accident about BTG that I don't know? |
If you sometimes browse Reddit forums, here's one of them. https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/7drv3v/scam_warningbitcoin_gold_wallet_stole_all_my/ |
You see what i mean? After all this, I now arrive at the conclusion that
this guy needs to act like it and it helps him cope with life. For me not
being able to help him any further and now realizing that he has some
mental instability i shall degrees and let this matter die.
…On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 4:11 AM, quadrigahacker ***@***.***> wrote:
Lol who said I lost any money? I've never touched Bitcoin Gold from the
beginning because from the first day I heard of BTG, I know it's a scam.
Someone on Reddit did, however. And there're a lot of them. @StarbuckBG
<https://github.com/starbuckbg> and Jack Liao is going to jail.
I'm only here for some fun seeing how criminals like @StarbuckBG
<https://github.com/starbuckbg> can lose all their reputations and money
just by their wrong actions themselves.
You really think me ditching here helped in any way of the BTG price going
down? No, I don't think so. Not a lot of people would read Github comments.
It's all just BTG team's silly action from the beginning. They've started
to shot themselves in the foot from the beginning.
Also, just curious, what's the "unfortunate incident in the beginning"?
Are there any more scam-y accident about BTG that I don't know?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Afnzlc366ZZKdwfY89EczlWwV339t9oNks5s345egaJpZM4Qbtma>
.
--
Greetings,
Zhivko Kostadinov
/*code smart...not hard.*/
|
@ZhiKosta like I said before... the guy is nothing but a troll and a quack. and ppl just keep feeding into this pointless matter, noboody will care about it or remember it in 100 years, just end this thread already, seriously. |
Lol who's there needing help? I'm not the one that losing money from BTG, but I bet you are @ZhiKosta, right? Anyone still joining the Bitcoin Gold scam is plain stupid and should find themselves in hospital. I've been consistent with my action from the beginning, but what are you doing @StarbuckBG (a.k.a. @ZhiKosta)? You have "changed your mind" many times regarding the stealing issue and each time you do, you prove how immature you are. People won't just "let this matter die". This matter will keep coming out any time when Bitcoin Gold is proved scam-y. People will mention this again in the MyBTGWallet issue, and in any future thread when their money is stolen again. Lol if you lose, just leave. Nobody forces any of you @ZhiKosta @D3m0nKingx to be here. Bye and have a good time! :) |
@StarbuckBG is Quack as i said before - facts... Official statement: https://bitcoingold.org/premine-endowment/ "There was, understandably, a lot of attention to the 5% of the premine which was earmarked as “Initial reward for core team” in the Roadmap. That represents 5,000 coins, divided among six core team members, or about 833 coins each – so each core member receives about 0.005% of the existing coin supply (at the time) for their roles in getting this project off the ground during months before launch. " |
in my Opinion guthub is generally NOT the right place to discuss this or to blame anyone more than needed. As an initial start it is good to mentions some hidden fees here, but an ongoing discussion is better at If someone discovers a hidden fee in a fork which was not explained and showed in the readme you can "force" that peron my social pressure to do so. In the firts time to hide some fee is already a demolition of any crypto project. But that is another topic to discus somewhere else. If you want to get rid of the fee use the little button at the top right of the project page which is labeled with "FORK". |
@jagottsicher No, we does not have reddit,slack or twitter and they are not so useful to discuss something like github |
I wish to say hi to all the trolls that were shitting on BTG. We're still here and stronger then ever. How about you? |
Looks like StarbugBG (Martin Kuvandzhiev) snuck a little easter egg in form of a hidden 0.5% fee directly paid to his wallet via coinbase tx into the pool code he suggested everyone to use:
https://github.com/StarbuckBG/node-stratum-pool/blob/master/lib/pool.js#L267
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: